I like to eat sushi once every couple of weeks. Honestly, I can only eat the salmon. My tastebuds just don’t understand any of the other fish flavors and will immediately cringe and discard them.
Since I only eat fish on occasion, I hadn’t really thought about intake recommendations. And then I read the recent Seattle Times and Seattle Weekly articles about fish consumption and water pollutant standards in the state of Washington and how the two are linked. If the official recommended amount of fish consumption goes up, then the water quality needs to go up, unless (as I learned) the official standards also increase the allowed or acceptable risks of cancer.
After reading the articles, my initial response was “Wow, that’s an amazing playing with numbers, laws, and public health.” And then I thought about the root of it. We are adapting to the situation. Human living has created toxins and those toxins have spread into the environment. To preserve the balance between business profit and human health, some sacrifices will be made for adaptation – payment for new technology to remove at least some toxins from industrial waste, and either expose yourself to additional health risk if you want to eat fish or eliminate that food source from your diet.
Adaptation as a reactive thought seems to be a preferred solution to many social issues or events (noise, violence, consumerism, dominion); making adjustments to live within certain circumstances, until those circumstances become more normal, and maybe even expected. Adapting comes to mind as a taught means of survival or ‘human nature’ truth. Is it really a truth or has it become a learned social pattern for reaction or response?
Perhaps it’s about the intention of why we adapt. Do we naturally lean toward adaptation as a species to survive a specific moment, or have we learned that we should adapt as a social control, to keep things flowing smooth, avoid conflict, don’t rock the boat, and enjoy what you have.
And is adaptation the expected course? After reading that a state has the authority to determine water toxicity levels, food consumption rates and allowable amounts of cancer risk, would the expected thought be “This is the world I live in and I must find a way to rationalize and get used to it.”